The History of Theater in Iran
The History of Thetre in Iran
Author:
Format:
ISBN:
Price:
Date:
Status:
Willem Floor
Paperback
340 pgs
8.5 x 11"
0-934211-29-9
$50
2005
In Stock


Although most people do not speak of theater and Iran in the same breath, dramatic expression has always been a fixture of Iranian culture. Some 2500 years ago, kings and commoners alike were regaled by comic theater in the form of dance and mime, accompanied by music. The dancers often wore masks, a vestige of an earlier era when such dances were enacted as religious rites. Comic drama also took a slapstick form, in which social situations were lampooned and people ridiculed by imitating their accents and behavior. Yet another ancient dramatic art was that of puppets, known to exist much earlier than its attested date of about 1000 CE. Only glove and string puppets were popular in Iran; shadow puppetry failed to win a following.

Like comic dance and mime, narrative drama originated in religious rites. Secularization of these rites produced an epic tradition that was very popular in pre-Islamic Iran. The bard had an important place in social life, and the verbal art of poetry, storytelling, elegy and recitation thrived, often accompanied by music. In Islamic times, this art form was given impetus by elegies and public recitations about the heroic deeds of ancient kings. In addition, Iran produced the only form of Islamic religious epic drama (ta`ziyeh-khvani), which dealt with the martyrdom of Imam Hoseyn.
In traditional Iranian theater, there was no real difference between high and low culture, although artists attached to the royal court and sponsored by the rich tended to be more competent than those who performed for the public at large. With the exception of religious and narrative drama, written texts were seldom used. The artists—whether comedian, mime, puppeteer, elegist or storyteller performed both in public and private spaces.

The arrival of European theater, with its reliance on a written text and normative rather than improvisatory acting, was part of the modernization process in Iran. European theater was introduced to the country in 1878, enjoyed a hey-day in the early years of the twentieth century, and has experienced many ups-and-downs since then. Today, it once again enjoys great popularity. At the same time, traditional theatre is being rediscovered, and playwrights are using some of its forms to develop indigenous modern Iranian theatre—a melding of the deep past and dynamic present.






coming soon

return to top


Table of Contents

FOREWORD 11
CHAPTER ONE: COMIC IMPROVISATORY DRAMA 13
Introduction 13
Who Were the Entertainers? 23
Entertainers in the Pre-Islamic Period 25
Entertainers in the Early Islamic Period 28
Entertainers in the Timurid Period 30
Entertainers in the Safavid Period 32
Entertainers in the Qajar Period 37
Tamasha and Taqlid 41
Baqqal-bazi 55
Female Plays 60


CHAPTER TWO: PUPPET DRAMA 62
Introduction 62
Shadow Theater 63
Glove Puppets 65
String Puppets or Marionettes. 70


CHAPTER THREE: NARRATIVE DRAMA OR DRAMATIC STORYTELLING 82
Introduction 82
Non-religious Epic Drama or Naqqali 85
Impact of Modernization 103


CHAPTER FOUR: ELEGY RECITATION OR MARTHIYEH-KHVANI 107
Introduction 107
Rowzeh-Khvani 110
Pardeh-dari or Picture Narration 119


CHAPTER FIVE: RELIGIOUS EPIC DRAMA 124
Introduction 124
Theater (Takiyeh) to Stage the Passion Play 132
The Months of Mourning 138
Takiyeh Buildings 139
Royal Theater (Takiyeh-ye Dowlat) 140
Lay-out and Embellishment of the Takiyeh 145
Number of Takiyehs 147
Financing Ta`ziyeh-khvani Is a Pious Act 149
Nature of the Text of the Passion Play 155
Sequencing of Passion Play Episodes 158
Stage Directors 161
Actors 162
Costumes 166
Mise-en-Scene 170
Start of the Performance: rowzeh-khvani 171
The Tragedy 174
Consequences for Actors 181
The Tragic Interspersed with Comedy 183
Water Carriers 186
Keeping the House in Order 186
Passion Play for and By Women 187
Spectator Behavior During the Performance
of the Passion Play 189
Foreign Spectators 190
Behavior of Spectators After the Performance
of the Passion Play 191
The Opposition Against the Passion Play 196
Non-Karbala But Related Passion Plays 199
The Episode of the European Ambassador 201
The `Omar-Koshan Festivity and Play 203


CHAPTER 6: MODERN THEATER 213
The Early Beginnings 213
Translations and Iranian plays 219
The Constitutional Revolution of 1906: A Boost
for Modern Theater 222
Tehran 223
Non-Moslem Theatrical Groups 230
Groups of Foreign Actors 232
Operettas and Musicals 235
Tabriz 239
Resht 243
Mashhad 248
Isfahan 249
Kermanshah 252
Qazvin 252
Other Towns 253
Main Characterstics of Theatrical Life in Late Qajar Iran 254
Reza Shah Period (1925–1941) 258
Tehran 263
Tabriz 268
Resht 269
Qazvin 269
Ardabil 270
Kermanshah 270
Isfahan 271
Mashhad 273
Shiraz 274
Other Towns 274
Mohammad Reza Shah Period (1941–1979) 277
Mashhad 277
Tabriz 278
Resht 278
Isfahan 280
Shiraz 282
Hamadan 282
Tehran 283
Major Performers and Playwrights 289
Theatrical Festivals 292
Theater at Death’s Door 294
Theater During the Islamic Republic (1979–_) 297


APPENDICES 305
Pahlavan Kachal 305
The Vizier of the Khan of Lenkoran 311


BIBLIOGRAPHY 314

return to top

Excerpt

COMIC IMPROVISATORY DRAMA

Introduction
Dramatic performance has existed in Iran throughout history, although some Iranian and Western scholars say differently. Drama in Iran is generally thought to be of recent date and of European origin. It is further believed that the devel-opment of formal theatrical institutions is of an even more recent date. Religious Islamic opposition against frivolous entertainment of any kind in general, and the impersonation of living beings in particular, is sometimes cited as an expla-nation for the slow development of theatrical drama in Iran and elsewhere. This certainly was the case, but as will be clear from the discussion in this book, de-spite opposition and warnings from conservative Moslems it never stopped dra-matic artists from performing and from Moslems enjoying their performances. Although Western¬-style drama was indeed introduced in Iran in the nineteenth century, this did not mean that indigenous dramatic art did not exist in Iran prior to the nineteenth century; it was, however, not necessarily of the kind that West-erners identify as theater, as much of Iran’s dramatic art took the form of folk theater. Not much is known about the manifestations of these early art forms, but I discuss what is known about them and how they grew into art forms that are more recognizable to the modern reader as dramatic art.

Many people may not necessarily recognize these early art forms as theatrical per-formance, because most people in the twenty-first century have been divorced from their ancient cultural roots and have no or little inkling that dramatic per-formances usually were not staged in a theater. It also depends, of course, how you define drama. Therefore I state upfront what I mean by the term ‘drama’ when I use it in this study. Drama is the writing, acting, or producing of a por-trayal of life characters or the telling of a story, usually involving conflicts and emotions exhibited through action and dialogue. In short, it is an art form, usually in dialogue, that centers on the actions of characters. Taking this as my starting point means that drama is not necessarily only a written text that is performed by actors in a building often specifically built for that purpose. The definition explic-itly includes minstrels, mimes, dancers, story-tellers, in fact anyone acting out the action of characters in song, spoken words, or gesture.

Iran is unique in that within its borders the only form of Islamic religious drama (ta`ziyeh-khvani) came into being. What is characteristic for traditional Iranian drama is that with the exception of religious and narrative drama written texts were seldom used. Dramatic art in Iran was strong on improvisation emphasizing the limited role that written text played. The difference between high and low cul-ture was a rather artificial one; all traditional forms of Iranian dramatic art were expressions of popular culture. Those artists who were attached to the royal court and sponsored by the rich were just better and more competent than their less for-tunate colleagues, who performed for the public at large.

Theater was initially of a ritual nature, a dramatization of man’s relationship with nature, the gods, and other human beings. Theater was born out of sacred rites performed by priests and lay actors dramatizing myths and legends at fixed times and often in fixed locations. As such the dialogues of the Avesta (ca. 1000 BCE) may be considered as a source for, if not a form of, this ritual religious drama as may ta`ziyeh-khvani or Shi`ite religious tragedy. Folk theater—mime, puppetry, farce, juggling—also had a ritual context in that it was performed at religious and/or social high days such as days of naming, circumcisions, and marriages. Often these plays were seasonal due to the agricultural calendar that made peas-ants ‘available’ as an audience and as actors only at certain times of the year. Over time some of these contextual ritual enactments became divorced from their religious meaning and they were performed throughout the year. However, until this day many of these dramatized rites are still performed at the times and for the (watered-down) purposes for which they originally had come into being.

For example, Georg Goyan has argued that Armenian theater grew out of the fu-neral rites for the gods Anahita-Gisane, the Armenian counterpart of the contem-porary Ishtar-Tammuz and the Anahita-Ahura Mazda cult in the Iranian Empire and other parts of the Middle East. The Armenian god Gisane was the son of the Mother Goddess Turan. Like the other gods, Gisane also had an astronomical symbol that represented his divinity in the celestial firmament. In his case it was a comet that appeared and disappeared on the horizon, symbolizing the god’s death and resurrection. Because of the tail of the comet and its form it was called the “hairy star” and the meaning of Gisane in Armenian literally is “the long haired one.” The priests or ministrants of Gisane were called gusans; they let their hair grow long in honor of their god. This hair was then combed high to resemble the tail of the comet. To achieve this effect the priests supported their hair with a cone-shaped gisakal, which over time developed into the onkos triangles such as worn in ancient Greek tragic theater. This is the origin of the onkos and the cone-shaped hats worn by the actors in antiquity. As stated above, the cult of Anahita-Gisane had its parallels elsewhere in the Middle-East and Eurasia: the funerary rites of, for example, Adonis with the god’s resurrection and his return into the arms of Decreta Aphrodite had its counterpart in Armenia. The resurrection of Gisane was also accompanied by bacchanals dedicated to celebrate nature’s fertil-ity in which the priestesses of the Armenian goddess of fertility (Anahita) played a prominent role. These priestesses were known as vartzak, about whom later.

Over time, the funerary rites for the god were also enacted for his human descen-dants, the semi-divine Armenian kings, and later for the Armenian nobility as a kind of ancestor worship. Like in the case of the rites for Gisane, the funerary rites for the Armenain kings and nobility also were performed by the dzainarku-gusans or the gusan-voghbergaks, singing mourners and wailers, who sang the praises of the deceased and his family. They rhapsodized the “immortal” heroic deeds of the deceased and thus the gusans were initially bards and minstrels and the ceremonial was not yet a play. Gradually, to more vividly portray the heroic deeds of the deceased, mimicry and dance were added to singing lamentation, which resulted in a presentation on stage and in the transformation of gusans into actors. Moses of Khorene mentioned that Armenians honored the memory of their departed kings with songs, pageantry and dancing. According to Goyan, this prac-tice evoked that of Roman funeral rites where masked actor-dancers represented the deceased with motions and gestures mimicking those of the deceased while singing the praise of his life. Because it was difficult for one actor-dancer to enact the life of the deceased one or more were added and thus tragic theater came into being.

Similarly comic Armenian theater developed out of the spring rites related to the Gisane cult, celebrating fertility and the return of life. Aristotle also opined that comedy originated with “the conceivers of phallic songs.” The revelry and the comic-singing (kataker-gutiun) in connection with the Gisane rites were indeed fertility rites in which both gusans (the Gisane priests) and the vartzaks (priest-esses of Anahita) participated. For a long time it was comic theater rather than tragic theater that dominated life in Armenia.

Thus, both tragic and comic Armenian theater originated in the funerary and res-urrection rites of Gisane-Ara. The funerary rites were characterized by lamenta-tion and wailing called voghbergutiun or song of lamentation in ancient Armenian. The resurrection rites that were characterized by laughter, banter and wild rejoicing were called katakergutiun, literally jesting or joyous singing. The modern Armenian word for tragic theater is voghbergutiun just like the old Arme-nian word for actor (vartzak) is a reminder of the original religious role of the ac-tor-dancer as the word vartzak is derived from the word vartz, meaning a bundle of young budding twigs tied with a ribbon, which symbolized spring and was an emblem of the resurrected god. Finally, the gusans, who originally were minis-trants of Gisane, over time turned into bards and mimes; thus along with the terms vartzak and voghbergutiun, clearly establishing the link between funerary rites and theater.

return to top





Willem Floor studied development economics and non-western sociology, as well as Persian, Arabic and Islamology from 1963-67 at the University of Utrecht (the Netherlands). He received his doctoral degree from the University of Leiden in 1971. Since 1983, Dr. Floor has been employed by the World Bank as an energy specialist. Throughout this time, he has published extensively on the socio-economic history of Iran. His most recent books include Safavid Government Institutions (2001) and The Traditional Crafts of Qajar Iran (2002).


return to top